The bdinfo -m should print only the board memory layout. Test the expected output.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org --- Cc: Bin Meng bmeng.cn@gmail.com Cc: Mario Six mario.six@gdsys.cc Cc: Nikhil M Jain n-jain1@ti.com Cc: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org --- test/cmd/bdinfo.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/cmd/bdinfo.c b/test/cmd/bdinfo.c index 2f34d877e5c..f090667fb42 100644 --- a/test/cmd/bdinfo.c +++ b/test/cmd/bdinfo.c @@ -130,13 +130,11 @@ static int lmb_test_dump_all(struct unit_test_state *uts, struct lmb *lmb) return 0; }
-static int bdinfo_test_all(struct unit_test_state *uts) +static int bdinfo_test_mem(struct unit_test_state *uts) { struct bd_info *bd = gd->bd; int i;
- ut_assertok(test_num_l(uts, "boot_params", 0)); - for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; ++i) { if (bd->bi_dram[i].size) { ut_assertok(test_num_l(uts, "DRAM bank", i)); @@ -147,6 +145,15 @@ static int bdinfo_test_all(struct unit_test_state *uts) } }
+ return 0; +} + +static int bdinfo_test_all(struct unit_test_state *uts) +{ + ut_assertok(test_num_l(uts, "boot_params", 0)); + + ut_assertok(bdinfo_test_mem(uts)); + /* CONFIG_SYS_HAS_SRAM testing not supported */ ut_assertok(test_num_l(uts, "flashstart", 0)); ut_assertok(test_num_l(uts, "flashsize", 0)); @@ -243,6 +250,19 @@ static int bdinfo_test_help(struct unit_test_state *uts)
BDINFO_TEST(bdinfo_test_help, UT_TESTF_CONSOLE_REC);
+static int bdinfo_test_memory(struct unit_test_state *uts) +{ + /* Test BDINFO memory layout only print */ + ut_assertok(console_record_reset_enable()); + ut_assertok(run_commandf("bdinfo -m")); + ut_assertok(bdinfo_test_mem(uts)); + ut_assertok(ut_check_console_end(uts)); + + return 0; +} + +BDINFO_TEST(bdinfo_test_memory, UT_TESTF_CONSOLE_REC); + int do_ut_bdinfo(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const argv[]) { struct unit_test *tests = UNIT_TEST_SUITE_START(bdinfo_test);