19 Apr
2013
19 Apr
'13
6:39 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Otavio Salvador otavio@ossystems.com.br wrote:
So I think this patch could be split in two:
I do not agree.
- one for loadaddr fix (which is the real fix here)
My patch does not do any fix. We are able to load a non-dt kernel currently.
I am adding a new feature: allow booting a dt kernel.
So in this case could you make a new patch to sync the other changes in the env? So it is kept in sync and avoid divertion from other boards we did it already?
-- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br