On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Icenowy Zheng icenowy@aosc.io wrote:
于 2017年6月7日 GMT+08:00 下午2:44:21, Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com 写到:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:47:18AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg_sun4i.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg_sun4i.h
new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..af1a1d56c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/cpucfg_sun4i.h @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/*
- Sunxi A31 CPUCFG register definition.
Calling that file sun4i doesn't make much sense, the A31 is part of sun6i, and the cpucfg block wasn't there with sun4i.
So... call it sun6i?
No. The original cpucfg.h is for the A20 and the A31, and all the single cluster SoC that followed.
The A83T's CPUCFG has more in common with the A80. You can just keep cpucfg.h unchanged, and rename the new one cpucfg-mcpm.h. You don't even need the generic cpucfg.h stub header you added.
Regards ChenYu