On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:31:10AM +1100, Bin Chen wrote:
Hello Tom,
Any feedback on this?
It's on my list to grab soon, thanks!
On 27 January 2018 at 16:59, Bin Chen bin.chen@linaro.org wrote:
I rebased the two patches submitted (quite )a while ago on top of current U-boot master fb4413295c765aa8c013650984dc2d908964c81d (and there were no conflicts).
The first patch added the support of parsing the second area of Android image so that it can be used for good. On Poplar board, we are using that area for dtb. The first patch shouldn't impact any functionality since it is new.
The second patch moves the booti_setup out of booti.c. It was the result of a discusion[1] how to better support the arm64 Android image.
I have boot tested it on Poplar board[2] with additional patch[3] that is built on top of the booti. I have hacked version of using bootm but it seems quit mess up - need lots of changes in different places ("Shotgun Surgery") to handle Android specific and/or arm64 specific code. Now, I feel a separate bootandroid command might be a cleaner solution.
That being said, the second patch doesn't depend on or impact any change we might have in the future for better Android support.
[1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-July/297933.html [2] https://github.com/96boards-poplar/Documentation [3] https://github.com/pierrchen/u-boot/commit/ 8463e6177654026746161487d0f0bd8998bb7a5b
Bin Chen (2): parse the second area of android image move booti_setup to arch/arm/lig/image.c
arch/arm/lib/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm/lib/image.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ cmd/booti.c | 92 +++++++-----------------------
common/image-android.c | 19 +++++++++++ include/image.h | 11 ++++++ 5 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/lib/image.c
-- 2.15.0
-- Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot