5 Sep
2006
5 Sep
'06
12:10 p.m.
Dear Hans,
in message OF22DDFE86.CF87E4ED-ONC12571E0.00270479-C12571E0.002B760F@philips.com you wrote:
The best and least intrusive solution we could come up with is therefore changing board_nand_init() to return != 0 if no nand_scan() should be done for a particular NAND device. It's not a totally nice solution
I agree that board_nand_init() could / should be changed to return a status code, and that this could be used to disable further accesses to a specific device.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Too many people are ready to carry the stool when the piano needs to
be moved.