On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:58:50AM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:43:51 -0500 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
Hi Tom,
At this point, sunxi-common.h is used for all systems except for some MACH_SUN50I variants. Remove the now basically empty header files and update CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME to use sunxi-common.h directly.
So is this #include <include/configs/$CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME.h> the only user of this symbol? I was on the brink of removing those files several times already, but wasn't sure if that has side effects. I think buildman names use that as well, so we can't run "./buildman sun7i" anymore? If that's the only thing, I am fine with this.
Yup, that's the only place it's used.
Actually the content of sun50i.h is bogus, since we don't define CONFIG_GICV2, so don't need the GIC addresses. So this can go as well, and SYS_CONFIG_NAME can maybe just become "sunxi"?
Samuel, does this torpedo any RISC-V efforts?
I'll do the move for v2 and keep an eye out if that's a problem for RISC-V efforts.