Hi
Il gio 12 mag 2022, 20:02 Sean Nyekjaer sean@geanix.com ha scritto:
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:24:01PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2022 12:19:01 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2022 15:08:15 Miquel Raynal wrote:
Hello,
trini@konsulko.com wrote on Thu, 5 May 2022 09:15:00 -0400:
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 11:26:37AM +0200, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
From: Sean Nyekjaer sean.nyekjaer.ext@siemensgamesa.com
When compling for x86: ld.bfd: fs/squashfs/sqfs.o: in function `sqfs_read': u-boot/fs/squashfs/sqfs.c:1443: undefined reference to
`__udivmoddi4'
ld.bfd: u-boot/fs/squashfs/sqfs.c:1521: undefined reference to
`__udivmoddi4'
Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <
sean.nyekjaer.ext@siemensgamesa.com>
fs/squashfs/sqfs.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/squashfs/sqfs.c b/fs/squashfs/sqfs.c index 5d9c52af80..6405db4ff3 100644 --- a/fs/squashfs/sqfs.c +++ b/fs/squashfs/sqfs.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ */
#include <asm/unaligned.h> +#include <div64.h> #include <errno.h> #include <fs.h> #include <linux/types.h> @@ -1440,7 +1441,7 @@ int sqfs_read(const char *filename, void
*buf, loff_t offset, loff_t len,
} for (j = 0; j < datablk_count; j++) {
start = data_offset / ctxt.cur_dev->blksz;
start = do_div(data_offset, ctxt.cur_dev->blksz); table_size = SQFS_BLOCK_SIZE(finfo.blk_sizes[j]); table_offset = data_offset - (start *ctxt.cur_dev->blksz);
n_blks = DIV_ROUND_UP(table_size + table_offset,@@ -1516,7 +1517,7 @@ int sqfs_read(const char *filename, void
*buf, loff_t offset, loff_t len,
goto out; }
start = frag_entry.start / ctxt.cur_dev->blksz;
start = do_div(frag_entry.start, ctxt.cur_dev->blksz); table_size = SQFS_BLOCK_SIZE(frag_entry.size); table_offset = frag_entry.start - (start *ctxt.cur_dev->blksz);
n_blks = DIV_ROUND_UP(table_size + table_offset,ctxt.cur_dev->blksz);
Adding maintainers...
I guess that's a correct fix, so
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
Thanks, Miquèl
Hello! do_div() macro modifies its first argument. It is correct? Because previous code did not modify anything.
- The semantics of do_div() are:
- u32 do_div(u64 *n, u32 base)
- {
- u32 remainder = *n % base;
- *n = *n / base;
- return remainder;
- }
And this patch replaced:
start = data_offset / ctxt.cur_dev->blksz;
by:
start = do_div(data_offset, ctxt.cur_dev->blksz);
which expands to:
start = data_offset % ctxt.cur_dev->blksz; data_offset = data_offset / ctxt.cur_dev->blksz;
Which is wrong as it calculates something totally different.
So this patch is incorrect.
Hi Pali,
Yes I agree, I got tricked by some wrong cache from Yocto :/ I have tried lldiv(), and that works on our x86 target.
start = data_offset; do_div(start, ctxt.cur_dev->blksz);
Something like this?
Michael
Do you have an opinion on that? Or do you have another idea to avoid the "undefined reference to `__udivmoddi4'" error?
/Sean