Due to a non-existing parameter name in macro's, use of those macro's will cause a compiler error of "undefined reference". Unfortunately, dm test doesn't fail because a wrong name ("&dev", hence it is accidentally a valid name in the context of a caller site) is passed on.
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.akashi@linaro.org Fixes: f262d4ca4b2b ("dm: core: Add a way to read platdata for all child devices") Fixes: 903e83ee8464 ("dm: core: Add a way to iterate through children, probing each") --- include/dm/device.h | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/dm/device.h b/include/dm/device.h index 3028d002ab0d..f7900417066d 100644 --- a/include/dm/device.h +++ b/include/dm/device.h @@ -959,8 +959,8 @@ static inline bool device_is_on_pci_bus(const struct udevice *dev) * @parent: parent device to scan */ #define device_foreach_child_of_to_plat(pos, parent) \ - for (int _ret = device_first_child_ofdata_err(parent, &dev); !_ret; \ - _ret = device_next_child_ofdata_err(&dev)) + for (int _ret = device_first_child_ofdata_err(parent, &pos); !_ret; \ + _ret = device_next_child_ofdata_err(&pos))
/** * device_foreach_child_probe() - iterate through children, probing them @@ -976,8 +976,8 @@ static inline bool device_is_on_pci_bus(const struct udevice *dev) * @parent: parent device to scan */ #define device_foreach_child_probe(pos, parent) \ - for (int _ret = device_first_child_err(parent, &dev); !_ret; \ - _ret = device_next_child_err(&dev)) + for (int _ret = device_first_child_err(parent, &pos); !_ret; \ + _ret = device_next_child_err(&pos))
/** * dm_scan_fdt_dev() - Bind child device in the device tree