Hi Wolfgang,
Why don't you submit patches against top of tree?
I don't have access to CVS in my office. Moreover, my last submitted patches (mainly for at91rm9200dk) were submitted against the release and not against CVS, and you accepted them... That's why I did the same thing today...
But, as I have to try to find a solution to submit my nandflash patch against "testing-NAND" branch, I can try to submit other patches against top of tree at the same time, in this case, forget all patches I submitted today and I will re-submit them later. Is it OK for you?
Best regards. Nicolas.
-----Original Message----- From: wd@denx.de [mailto:wd@denx.de] Sent: lundi 23 janvier 2006 15:23 To: Lacressonniere Nicolas Cc: U-Boot-Users Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 1/5] Add support for AT91SAM9261EK board
In message KAEELLICOFHDAEPIACDEAEOECFAA.nicolas.lacressonniere@rfo.atmel.com you wrote:
These patches are applied against the 1.1.4 release and should be applied
in
numerical order.
Why don't you submit patches against top of tree?
This patch (1/5) adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9261EK board.
Ummm... "this patch"? There is no patch anywhere...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
-- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de Oh, that sound of male ego. You travel halfway across the galaxy and it's still the same song. -- Eve McHuron, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1330.1