Hi Fabio
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 08:27 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Heiko Thiery and Marcel,
On 19/08/2021 16:28, Fabio Estevam wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi index f200afac9f..75cd59e545 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ };
- flash { + spl { mkimage { args = "-n spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout -T imx8mimage -e 0x7e1000";
@@ -217,4 +217,19 @@ }; }; };
+ imx-boot { + filename = "flash.bin"; + pad-byte = <0x00>;
+ spl: blob-ext@1 { + offset = <0x0>; + filename = "spl.bin"; + };
+ uboot: blob-ext@2 { + offset = <0x57c00>; + filename = "u-boot.itb"; + }; + }; };
Do we have a consensus on the binman format to generate a monolithic flash.bin?
Yes, I would say so. Remember, I did include this already in our latest verdin-imx8mm specific patch set together with its migration to using binman [1].
I understand that patch 2/2 still needs to be improved, but what about this one?
Yes, I agree.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com
[1] https://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=162949278629882
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
Cheers
Marcel