-----Original Message----- From: Michael Walle [mailto:michael@walle.cc] Sent: 29 March 2012 20:09 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl
Am Donnerstag 29 März 2012, 16:24:23 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Walle [mailto:michael@walle.cc] Sent: 29 March 2012 18:08 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl
Am Dienstag 27 März 2012, 09:27:49 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
# diff --git a/board/buffalo/lsxl/config.mk b/board/buffalo/lsxl/config.mk new file mode 100644 index 0000000..062554b --- /dev/null +++ b/board/buffalo/lsxl/config.mk @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ALL-y += $(obj)u-boot.kwb
Pls remove this file
Is there another way to build the u-boot.kwb binary by default?
The main Makefile states: # Always append ALL so that arch config.mk's can add custom ones
and theres a rule for $(obj)u-boot.kwb.
Just pass u-boot.kwm to the make, will do the needful, if this
satisfies
the goal of generating u-boot.kwb, then why to add one file to the
source
code?
- this won't work easily for out-of-tree builds, will it? because you
have to pass $(obj)u-boot.kwb to make and $(obj) is $O which is specified by the user, so he has to specify it twice
Dear Michael,
AFAIK, you need to pass only "u-boot.kwb" to the make (no $(okj) needed)
- i'm only interested in the u-boot.kwb, why shouldn't it be
generated by default?
- i can't build it with a sinlge make call. Eg. atm i'm doing make -j3 -C ../u-boot O=`pwd` CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi-
lschlv2 otherwise i have to do make -j3 -C ../u-boot O=`pwd` CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- lschlv2 make -j3 -C ../u-boot O=`pwd` CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- \ `pwd`/u-boot.kwb
"make u-boot.kwb CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi-" generates u-boot.kwb, this should be valid with other use case too. if not, it makes sense to add an additional line in script that a file in code :-)
Regards.. Prafulla . ..