On 22/02/2017 11:40, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Sunday 19 February 2017 09:30 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 02/02/2017 15:56, Jagan Teki wrote:
From: Jagan Teki jagan@amarulasolutions.com
Add board_mmc_get_env_dev
Switch the mmc env based on the mmc devno, instead of separately defining a config item in include/configs using board_mmc_get_env_dev
- devno 0: sd/esd
- devno 1: mmc/emmc
Cc: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de Cc: Matteo Lisi matteo.lisi@engicam.com Cc: Michael Trimarchi michael@amarulasolutions.com Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki jagan@amarulasolutions.com
board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c b/board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c index f289e91..d2f9309 100644 --- a/board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c +++ b/board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c @@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ int board_init(void) }
#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC +int board_mmc_get_env_dev(int devno) +{
- /* dev 0 for SD/eSD, dev 1 for MMC/eMMC */
- return (devno == 3) ? 1 : 0;
+}
static void mmc_late_init(void) { char cmd[32];
IMHO just patch 1 has an issue - could you resubmit just that patch ? I will merge then the whole patchset.
look like there are few other patches have merge issue, will resolve and send the two series again, will it be OK?
Absolutely, thanks !
Best regards, Stefano