Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1285828543.20234.5.camel@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
The existing I2C_ADDR_LIST isn't documented, so I didn't document this addition. I'll mention them both in doc/README.POST.
Thanks.
What I don't understand yet: why do we need a balck (ignore) list at all, when we already have a white list (I2C_ADDR_LIST) ?
Should not one be sufficient?
Hmm.. as this is only used in post code, this should be visible in the defines name, what with:
I2C_POST_ADDR_IGNORE_LIST
I was following the lead of the existing I2C_ADDR_LIST define. Agreed it should be named differently. I'll go with CONFIG_SYS_POST_I2C_ADDRS and CONFIG_SYS_POST_I2C_IGNORES unless someone else chimes in.
Argh... I don't like identifiers that need half a line or more...
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk