On 15. 10. 20 17:05, Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 01:51, Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com wrote:
The commit 9f45aeb93727 ("spl: fit: implement fdt_record_loadable") which introduced fdt_record_loadable() state there spl_fit.c is not 64bit safe. Based on my tests on Xilinx ZynqMP zcu102 platform there shouldn't be a problem to record these addresses in 64bit format. The patch adds support for systems which need to load images above 4GB.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com
(no changes since v1)
common/fdt_support.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
I am wondering whether we should use #size-cells etc. to select this?
size-cells/address-cells are used for reg property. We are not using it and it is really just property with two cells which are pointing to address. That's why I don't think we need this property there.
Thanks, Michal