On 29.03.19 11:04, Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com wrote:
On 26.03.2019 14:16, Stefan Roese wrote:
This patch adds the CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE option to select the SPL image that shall be used to generate the combined SPL + U-Boot image. The default value is the current value "spl/u-boot-spl.bin". > This patch also sets CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE to "spl/boot.bin" for AT91 targets which use SPL NAND support (boot from NAND).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese sr@denx.de Cc: Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de Cc: Andreas Bießmann andreas@biessmann.org Cc: Eugen Hristev eugen.hristev@microchip.com
v2:
No change
Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++ Makefile | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig index 305b265ed7..7c2b86f1f3 100644 --- a/Kconfig +++ b/Kconfig @@ -224,6 +224,15 @@ config BUILD_ROM which are not shipped in the U-Boot source tree. Please, see doc/README.x86 for details.
+config SPL_IMAGE
- string "SPL image filename that is generated"
- default "spl/boot.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
- default "spl/u-boot-spl.bin"
Hi Stefan,
This means that the old spl/u-boot-spl.bin is gone for AT91 and NAND ? Please correct me if I am wrong
No, its still there.
- help
The SPL image filename that is generated by the build process.This image might be used to generated a combined image withSPL and main U-Boot proper as well.- config BUILD_TARGET string "Build target special images" default "u-boot-with-spl.sfp" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10
@@ -232,6 +241,7 @@ config BUILD_TARGET default "u-boot-elf.srec" if RCAR_GEN3 default "u-boot.itb" if SPL_LOAD_FIT && ARCH_SUNXI default "u-boot.kwb" if KIRKWOOD
- default "u-boot-with-spl.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
This means that before this patch, there was no special target for AT91 ?
Yes.
Thus no special image was built ?
Yes.
And after this patch, there will also be a new binary u-boot-with-spl.bin, except spl/boot.bin and spl/u-boot-spl.bin ?
The old binaries are still generated. Only a new combined image is generated too.
Thus your patch does a bit more than what it's explained in the commit message ?
Does it? What exactly is missing in the commit message? Please explain and I'll add something in the next patch version.
Thanks, Stefan