On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 18:57, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Indeed, such a branch can be helpful. Also a pull request for it. =A0But we're talking about the _original_ patches.
and that's what my serial/post/sf patches ended up being. should i
You don't want to understand, right? You posted _new_ patches. There is a chance that these might actually be identical to any previously posted ones, but my time is way too precious that I would spend a single second on checking this, especially when you ignore all rules (version marker in the Subject, change log in the comment section).
and like i *already* said, i verified that the patches just posted match the ones already posted in the past by downloading them from patchwork and doing a diff on them.
I have already wasted way too much time on this stupid issue. I do not intend to continue this discussion.
so basically you're permanently NAK-ing all my patches even though i'm trying to find a way forward. awesome. -mike