
On 11/06/2017 01:09 AM, Ashish Kumar wrote:
In case of PHY-less mode, there is no interaction with PHY so auto-neg etc is not required and link will have fixed attributes
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar Ashish.Kumar@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com
drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c b/drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c index 21be79a..85e7faa 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c +++ b/drivers/net/ldpaa_eth/ldpaa_eth.c @@ -440,12 +440,17 @@ static int ldpaa_eth_open(struct eth_device *net_dev, bd_t *bd) bus = wriop_get_mdio(priv->dpmac_id); enet_if = wriop_get_enet_if(priv->dpmac_id); if ((bus == NULL) &&
(enet_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII)) {
((enet_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII) ||
priv->phydev = (struct phy_device *) malloc(sizeof(struct phy_device)); memset(priv->phydev, 0, sizeof(struct phy_device));(enet_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII))) {
priv->phydev->speed = SPEED_10000;
if (enet_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII)
priv->phydev->speed = SPEED_10000;
else
priv->phydev->speed = SPEED_1000;
- priv->phydev->link = 1; priv->phydev->duplex = DUPLEX_FULL; }
How was this patch tested?
A little off-topic. I remember a similar discussion somewhere (maybe internal) for PowerPC-based boards regarding fixed SGMII port. When the port doesn't have a PHY, it fails due to PHY id check. I don't find the change in U-Boot code. Does anyone remember it?
York