When the CONFIG_ATMEL_LEGACY is undefined, according to the following defines, at91_set_gpio_value() references to at91_set_pio_value(x, y) with two parameters. #define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y) at91_set_pio_value(x, y) #define at91_get_gpio_value(x) at91_get_pio_value(x)
But there isn't the implementation of at91_set_pio_value(x, y) with two parameters in U-Boot. This is an error.
Same as at91_get_gpio_value(x) define.
Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang wenyou.yang@atmel.com ---
Changes in v2: - Improve the commit log.
arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h index 5a32bdba8d..df0f71975a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h @@ -223,15 +223,13 @@ static inline unsigned pin_to_mask(unsigned pin) at91_set_pio_output((x - PIN_BASE) / 32,(x % 32), y) #define at91_set_gpio_input(x, y) \ at91_set_pio_input((x - PIN_BASE) / 32,(x % 32), y) -#define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y) \ - at91_set_pio_value((x - PIN_BASE) / 32,(x % 32), y) -#define at91_get_gpio_value(x) \ - at91_get_pio_value((x - PIN_BASE) / 32,(x % 32)) -#else -#define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y) at91_set_pio_value(x, y) -#define at91_get_gpio_value(x) at91_get_pio_value(x) #endif
+#define at91_set_gpio_value(x, y) \ + at91_set_pio_value((x / 32), (x % 32), y) +#define at91_get_gpio_value(x) \ + at91_get_pio_value((x / 32), (x % 32)) + #define GPIO_PIOA_BASE (0) #define GPIO_PIOB_BASE (GPIO_PIOA_BASE + 32) #define GPIO_PIOC_BASE (GPIO_PIOB_BASE + 32)