There is no need to expose SoC choice to user, we already got the SoC according to the build target. So default "select MX6UL" for MX6UL_14x14_EVK target.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Peng.Fan@freescale.com Cc: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com ---
Hi Stefano,
From my side, I think we need to select MX6x for other TARGET_xx based
on MX6x. Later I'll do that work if you agree with my point.
From the long run, we can discard the MX6x, if we finally reach the goal
to support runtime check, but work to be done step by step:)
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig index 6c63277..3987eef 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ config TARGET_MX6SXSABRESD
config TARGET_MX6UL_14X14_EVK bool "mx6ul_14x14_evk" + select MX6UL select CPU_V7 select DM select DM_THERMAL