Hi Marek,
-----Original Message----- From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex@denx.de] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 2:45 AM To: Rajan Vaja RAJANV@xilinx.com Cc: monstr@monstr.eu; Albert Aribaud albert.u.boot@aribaud.net; Manjukumar Harthikote Matha MANJUKUM@xilinx.com; Jolly Shah JOLLYS@xilinx.com; Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com; u- boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: zynqmp: Update required API version to 1.0
On 05/21/2018 06:53 AM, Rajan Vaja wrote:
Hi Marek,
-----Original Message----- From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex@denx.de] Sent: 15 May 2018 02:26 AM To: Michal Simek michal.simek@xilinx.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Rajan Vaja RAJANV@xilinx.com; monstr@monstr.eu; Albert Aribaud albert.u.boot@aribaud.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: zynqmp: Update required API version to 1.0
On 05/14/2018 03:39 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
From: Rajan Vaja rajan.vaja@xilinx.com
Existing EEMI version is to as 1.0 (available from xilinx v2018.1 version). Update required API version to match with EEMI API version.
Not sure I understand this sentence.
New PMUFW version is required for operations with programmable logic.
Seems the meta-xilinx 2018.1 comes with PMUFW 2017.3 https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx/tree/rel-v2018.1/meta-xilinx- bsp/recipes-bsp/pmu-firmware
Is this out of date ?
[Rajan] PMU firmware is built using meta-xilinx-tools layer and not meta-xilinx-
bsp.
The recipe in meta-xilinx-bsp is to build OSL flow (using multilib) this is not
recommended nor supported from Xilinx.
Ah, I see, so there are three versions of pmu-firmware in a single release, but the one which is actually needed for the system to boot correctly is not in the meta-xilinx repo as one would expect, but in some other repo. That ... doesn't make any sense, but so be it.
If you are planning to use rel-v2018.x Xilinx tools release branches, stick with all the layers provided by Xilinx. The same is documented in wiki as well
http://www.wiki.xilinx.com/How%20to%20build%20images%20through%20yocto
If you want to use Yocto open-source release stick with branches likes rocko, morty etc. These branches will not have dependencies on Xilinx tools.
So it's this pmu-firmware_git recipe which provides different ABI in different versions of meta-xilinx-bsp, yet this is not in any way indicated by the package version, right ?
Didn’t get what you mean here? Package version is set according to the release under use https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx-tools/blob/master/classes/xsctapp.bbcl...
This should indicate, release version with a part of commit id of git being used.
Also, do I understand it correctly that Xilinx doesn't support arm64 with multilib?
Yes Xilinx does not support multilib way of building PMUFW. The official support is in meta-xilinx-tools layer with a dependency on xsct tool
Thanks, Manju