Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] initcall mechanism introduction

Dear Scott Wood,

In message 4A1C6B48.9050106@freescale.com you wrote:

I assume he meant that the image size was smaller, due to replacing explicit function calls with a table-driven approach.

We already have such a functionpoointer table - problem is that we don't use it everywhere, usually because the init function calls are intermixed with other code.

init_fnc_t *init_sequence[] was the idea that was supposed to solve this very problem, but look at the code...

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk