On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com wrote:
The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg" property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is not the case. Fix all occurences in the FIT image documentation files where this was not observed, to not give bad examples to the reader.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com
doc/uImage.FIT/beaglebone_vboot.txt | 84 +++++++++++----------- doc/uImage.FIT/command_syntax_extensions.txt | 42 +++++------ doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt | 52 +++++++------- doc/uImage.FIT/overlay-fdt-boot.txt | 78 ++++++++++----------- doc/uImage.FIT/signature.txt | 100 +++++++++++++-------------- doc/uImage.FIT/source_file_format.txt | 26 +++---- doc/uImage.FIT/x86-fit-boot.txt | 10 +-- 7 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
I'm not hugely keen on the inconsistency of kernel vs. hash@1, but I suppose it does not matter.
Regards, Simon