While working on bootflow, we noticed some wording inconsistencies with bootmeth versus bootmethod.
According to [1], we should use bootmeth(s), not bootmethod(s):
""" For version 2, a new naming scheme is used as above:
- bootdev is used instead of bootdevice, because 'device' is overused, is everywhere in U-Boot, can be confused with udevice - bootmeth - because 'method' is too vanilla, appears 1300 times in U-Boot """
[1] c.f. https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20211023232635.9195-1-sjg@chromium.org/
First patch fixes some trivial typos, second patch replaces all occurences of bootmethod(s) -> bootmeth(s).
Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek mkorpershoek@baylibre.com --- Changes in v2: - Made into a series - New patch replaces all bootmethod(s) -> bootmeth(s) - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240603-bootmeth-typos-v1-1-6edbdb469f7c@baylibre...
--- Mattijs Korpershoek (2): bootstd: Fix a handful of doc typos in bootmeth bootstd: Replace bootmethod(s) -> bootmeth(s)
board/sandbox/sandbox.env | 2 +- boot/bootmeth-uclass.c | 2 +- include/bootmeth.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- include/extlinux.h | 2 +- test/boot/bootflow.c | 2 +- test/boot/bootmeth.c | 6 +++--- 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) --- base-commit: ea722aa5eb33740ae77e8816aeb72b385e621cd0 change-id: 20240603-bootmeth-typos-47c865e70ccf
Best regards,