On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Calvin Johnson calvin.johnson@nxp.com wrote:
Hi York,
-----Original Message----- From: York Sun Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 12:00 AM To: Calvin Johnson calvin.johnson@nxp.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Anji Jagarlmudi anji.jagarlmudi@nxp.com; Joe Hershberger joe.hershberger@ni.com; Prabhakar Kushwaha prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ls1012a: fix tftp failure
On 11/21/2017 10:26 PM, Calvin Johnson wrote:
This patch series fixes bug which fails tftp sometimes while using the pfe interfaces and also has some code clean up.
Calvin Johnson (3): drivers: net: pfe_eth: add pfe_rx_done to clear bd after packet processing drivers: net: pfe_eth: use writel/readl to access hw bds drivers: net: pfe_eth: cleanup typos and indent
drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_eth.c | 13 ++-- include/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
Your PFE patch set is not fully reviewed or accepted. If I were you, I would probably send v2 version to include all the changes.
It is up to Joe to decide to take a new version, or patches on top of patches.
It's assigned to York in patchwork. would you prefer I take them?
I can squash all these follow up patches to v2 of the base pfe patch series. Yes, it will be better than having these patches on top of it as the base is not yet merged.
Thanks Calvin