
24 Sep
2012
24 Sep
'12
6:53 p.m.
Dear Joe Hershberger,
[...]
While you're touching all these files, why not replace the __u_boot_cmd* implementation with this as well. There's no need to leave a special case in there as well is there?
Not in the first stab, it can be indeed done later, but now I'd like to avoid breakage. Besides, replacing u_boot_cmd would break bisectability, I want to preserve it and rather apply more patches slowly than less patches recklessly.
. = ALIGN(4);
.u_boot_list : {
INCLUDE u-boot.lst;
}
. = ALIGN(4); __bss_start = .; .bss : { *(.bss) } __bss_end__ = .;
-Joe
Best regards, Marek Vasut