On Thursday, July 02, 2015 at 01:02:59 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
Add i.MX6UL pins IOMUX file which defines the IOMUX settings for choose.
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Peng.Fan@freescale.com Signed-off-by: Ye.Li B37916@freescale.com
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h | 2 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h | 1065 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 1067 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h index 534f780..4b6bb18 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6-pins.h @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ enum { #include "mx6sl_pins.h" #elif defined(CONFIG_MX6SX) #include "mx6sx_pins.h" +#elif defined(CONFIG_MX6UL) +#include "mx6ul_pins.h" #else #error "Please select cpu" #endif /* CONFIG_MX6Q */
Would it be possible to build a single image for an entire MX6 lineup of CPUs ? I think it is now possible to build a single image for MX6 Quad/Dual/DualLite/Solo ... do SX and UL integrate well into this too? Seeing this patch, I don't think so ...
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mx6ul_pins.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c92b4f0
How very different is this from Solo or SoloX ? Is the pinmux map really that different that it needs a new file of it's own (I did not check) ?
Best regards, Marek Vasut