Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] soft_i2c/i2c_probe(): Perform reads instead of writes

15 Jun 2005


      ...
...
...
...
...
"Tolunay" == Tolunay Orkun listmember@orkun.us writes:
...
...
Why write? Wouldn't a zero byte read transaction be safer?
Tolunay> I have read somewhere (that I cannot find now), that some
 Tolunay> device would lock up on 0-byte read vs 0-byte write. Since
 Tolunay> the current code is working as it is unless there is
 Tolunay> demonstrable problem with it, I would fix the comment only.
Ok, here's then a tiny patch to do that:
* Patch by Peter Korsgaard, 15 June 2005:
  Fix comment to match implementation for probe in soft_i2c.
-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard