On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 17:05 +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 16:27 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 21:03 +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote:
I did not find the discussion. Do we need revert the changes in U- Boot?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10098529/
It seems it has been dropped b/c v2 were sent and actually v3 was anticipated, but never appear.
Hmm... I'm wrong there is v3 and stated as applied.
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1559618.htm
l
Though in next-20180112 it was appeared last time.
This one seems explains what is the issue with this field
https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org/msg04706.htm
l
Also I didn't notice any blessing from hpa about protocol extension.
Sorry to bring this again. Looks as of today the addition to the acpi_rsdp_addr member is still not merged mainstream kernel. Do you think we need revert this in U-Boot, or keep it there but may cause some confusion?
Hmm... I guess I answered to your previous message. Anyway, I agree for the revert until we will have a clear picture with upstream.