On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 02/18/2013 06:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Tom Rini trini@ti.com wrote:
OK, I thought I said, but maybe I didn't, I'm OK with re-using the tree, but _not_ the master branch, u-boot-x86/sandbox would have been fine.
Personally I'd prefer another tree as done for other custodians. It makes life of new developers easier.
It doesn't scale, however. If I had my wish and we were starting this afresh, I'd go with user repositories rather than subject repositories. Using Simon as the example, I don't think he needs one for sandbox, one for patman (and other tools) and one for x86. I'd rather pull .../sjc/for-trini/x86-whatever-vs-something.
The hassle to send to separated branches is the same for different remotes; what concerns me is a new developer to try to find patman or sandbox pending patches and do not realize it is at x86 tree. This is confusing.