
23 Aug
2021
23 Aug
'21
1:27 p.m.
Hi Heiko Thiery and Marcel,
On 19/08/2021 16:28, Fabio Estevam wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi index f200afac9f..75cd59e545 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ };
flash {
- spl { mkimage { args = "-n spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout -T imx8mimage -e 0x7e1000";
@@ -217,4 +217,19 @@ }; }; };
- imx-boot {
filename = "flash.bin";
pad-byte = <0x00>;
spl: blob-ext@1 {
offset = <0x0>;
filename = "spl.bin";
};
uboot: blob-ext@2 {
offset = <0x57c00>;
filename = "u-boot.itb";
};
- };
};
Do we have a consensus on the binman format to generate a monolithic flash.bin?
I understand that patch 2/2 still needs to be improved, but what about this one?
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-60 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email:
festevam@denx.de