On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 03:57:08PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Fabio, Tom,
On 13.08.24 14:27, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 12:53 PM Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de wrote:
U-Boot 2024.07 drops on aristainetos2 board the following warning:
Failed to enable per_clkand bootlogo is not seen on LVDS display.
This patch uses old behaviour for systems without clock framework if CONFIG_CLK is not enabled.
Fixes: bfc778cb93a3 ("driver: pwm: pwm-imx: get and enable per/ipg clock using dm")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher hs@denx.de
Changes in v2: use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED instead of IS_ENABLED as Anatolij suggested.
This causes build failures:
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-imx/-/jobs/887503
Please fix and resend.
Hmm... yes ... I work/worked on aristainetos2 board update for 2024.07 (or later) ... and saw this
Failed to enable per_clk
warning when 2024.07 boots ... and bootlogo did not work anymore, as backlight is pwm driven on this hardware...
I bet, for all the boards which fail in the azure run with this patch, PWM do not work anymore... because CONFIG_CLK is not enabled for them!
I am really unhappy, that I have no automated U-Boot runtime tests anymore running on real hardware... setup with tbot was very easy, but had no time for looking at the bugs poping up...
Hmm... looking in git history, there comes this commit in my eyes:
commit 4eea76574062e9079b6a267229962d6ec0be910a Author: Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com Date: Sat Nov 19 18:45:18 2022 -0500
pwm: imx: Remove unused references to CONFIG_IMX6_PWM_PER_CLK On platforms that use DM_PWM, we do not need to define this value anymore, so remove it from config files. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>which exactly removes for all breaking boards this define...
Should we revert this patch?
I just can say for the aristianetos2 board, that I readded exactly this define in my work for the port to currentmainline ... and with my patch, pwm and so bootlogo works again ...
We can't do a strict revert, no, the symbol is now CFG_IMX6_PWM_PER_CLK. But also, isn't this board using DM_PWM? And if so, that value isn't used?