
16 Jul
2009
16 Jul
'09
9:50 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:51:10PM +0300, Valeriy Glushkov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Valeriy Glushkov gvv@lstec.com Signed-off-by: Paulraj, Sandeep s-paulraj@ti.com
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash.
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c | 10 +++++----- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c index fc16282..694ead6 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c @@ -567,10 +567,10 @@ int nand_read_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, loff_t offset, size_t *length,
if (len_incl_bad == *length) { rval = nand_read (nand, offset, length, buffer);
if (rval != 0)
printf ("NAND read from offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
if (!rval || rval == -EUCLEAN)
return 0;
printf ("NAND read from offset %llx failed %d\n",
offset, rval);
Out of curiosity, why invert the logic from if (error) print; return to if (!error) return; print; return?
-Scott