Stefan Roese wrote:
On Friday 18 December 2009 13:20:56 Stefan Roese wrote:
I think thats what it is. Both are same.
No, not exactly. They're nearly identical. But there are differences. Not sure if these differences are important though.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not NACK'ing the patch. I'm just pointing out that it's different from the Linux version.
Just to make it clear. Here a diff between both versions:
--- u-boot/include/asm-mips/unaligned.h +++ linux-2.6/linus/arch/mips/include/asm/unaligned.h @@ -8,19 +8,21 @@ #ifndef _ASM_MIPS_UNALIGNED_H #define _ASM_MIPS_UNALIGNED_H
-#include <compiler.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> #if defined(__MIPSEB__) +# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h> +# include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h> # define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_be # define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_be #elif defined(__MIPSEL__) +# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h> +# include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h> # define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le # define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le #else # error "MIPS, but neither __MIPSEB__, nor __MIPSEL__???" #endif
-# include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h> -# include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h> # include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
#endif /* _ASM_MIPS_UNALIGNED_H */
I think whatever Shinya sent was modified version of linux's unaligned.h and its working.
- Himanshu