sön 2007-09-23 klockan 23:12 -0600 skrev Grant Likely:
On 9/23/07, Shinya Kuribayashi skuribay@ruby.dti.ne.jp wrote:
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
It would be more useful to collect all boards using one specific chip in a single directory. arch/arm/<chip>/board.
This is too tight, isn't it? Strictly speaking, boards are not related to chips (at least for me). So I'll vote +1 for Jean's.
Just to throw a wrench in the works, what about boards like the Xilinx ML403 which can be *either* PowerPC or MicroBlaze. :-)
There won't be many of those boards,and I am sure that the community will find the right way to handle exceptions.
I still think sticking with the existing board/ directory (but perhaps organizing it better) makes the most sense. Each board directory can pull in whatever cpu/soc support it needs.
Cheers, g.
BR Ulf Samuelsson