From: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com
When an invalid USDHC port is passed we should return -EINVAL instead of 0.
Also, return the error immediately on fsl_esdhc_initialize() failure.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.estevam@freescale.com --- board/freescale/mx6qarm2/mx6qarm2.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/freescale/mx6qarm2/mx6qarm2.c b/board/freescale/mx6qarm2/mx6qarm2.c index 667dca5..3a5b26d 100644 --- a/board/freescale/mx6qarm2/mx6qarm2.c +++ b/board/freescale/mx6qarm2/mx6qarm2.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ int board_mmc_getcd(struct mmc *mmc)
int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis) { - s32 status = 0; + int ret; u32 index = 0;
usdhc_cfg[0].sdhc_clk = mxc_get_clock(MXC_ESDHC3_CLK); @@ -145,13 +145,15 @@ int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis) printf("Warning: you configured more USDHC controllers" "(%d) then supported by the board (%d)\n", index + 1, CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USDHC_NUM); - return status; + return -EINVAL; }
- status |= fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[index]); + ret = fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[index]); + if (ret) + return ret; }
- return status; + return 0; } #endif