2 Apr
2009
2 Apr
'09
3:26 p.m.
On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:03 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Detlev Zundel wrote:
I suggest to either remove this MSI_RI from the header again (it doesn't seem to be used here) or rename it.
Ok, so much for the plan to add the defines not bit by bit as needed, but register-wise, while we're there.
I actually would prefer to use UART_MSR_RI, as this is a UART thingy rather than to remove the define as we surely use the register, so I feel it worthwhile to have the whole definition on board.
That's my preference as well.
Agreed, when I saw MSR_RI I wasn't thinking UART at all.
- k