Dear Ricardo,
in message aa76a2be0807101219s4946b744h2ca925f1e9c7dbf8@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
Sorry to hear that. I have tried to give all my best and follow the style of the ml300 board, which was the closest board to mine. On FPGAs board I think that it is not a horrible idea to follow this style. Maybe you should consider to create an FPGA branch, where the generic drivers could be accepted. As I said, the FPGA hardware
Believe me, this makes no sense. Copying the same files around quickly results in an unmaintainable mess. Adding lots of code which are not actually needed just prevent anybody from actually understanding which code is essential and which not.
We've been there before, and we learned this lesson.
changes a lot and support a so changing hardware will be very difficult... Or just should not support FPGAs and its IP devices...
I do not think that FPGA have any inherent problems. The issue is with the base code which was not written with a boot loader (or portability and efficiency) in mind.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk