On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:22:10PM +0530, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:29 AM Priyanka Jain (OSS) priyanka.jain@oss.nxp.com wrote:
..
Tom,
I agree that bindings patch is essential for device-tree changes. But merging this patch will break Layerscape Platforms. We have requested Rayagonda to submit Binding patch to upstream for review.
If first patch of binding gets submitted timely, can we defer this patch.
Regards Priyanka
++Bharat, Roman and Henrik.
Yes, please keep me in the loop on this binding being reviewed upstream. Also, please check the tree for other bindings that haven't been submitted, but also haven't been noticed yet. There is not supposed to be anything outside of the -u-boot.dtsi files that can't be replaced by dropping in a newer set of upstream dts files. And the -u-boot.dtsi files are for u-boot specific bindings (that we're working on upstreaming) or actively in-review bindings upstream.
Are there any news on this topic? Was there a submission to linux for the binding in the meantime? Unfortunately, I wasn't in the loop here (albeit being the Reported-by: one). Until now, this patch is a prerequisite for my ls1028a device tree sync series [1].
-michael
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20211013161427.612033-1-michael@walle.cc/