On 11/09/2015 10:03 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
2015-11-09 1:38 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 09:56:18AM -0600, menon.nishanth@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote:
Conceptually fine with me. Do we really need a config option for it tho?
I was following the lines of CONFIG_CREATE_ARCH_SYMLINK here. Is there some reason why you'd not want it so?
Masahiro?
Is this an improvement?
I am unhappy because I was hoping we could stop creating symbolic links during building in a long run.
OK. what do we do? option 1: #include "..common/xyz.h" 141 something usage in board files do this for now..
option 2: -I...common (auto generated - original patch) #include "xyz.h" we dont like that since it does not tell us that xyz.h is a board-common header.
option 3: #include <board-common/xyz.h>
this needs a soft link which we dont like either.
are there any other ways to do this?