Hi Scott,
On 07/21/2012 07:40 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/20/2012 04:34 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
Hi Kim & Marek,
On 07/21/2012 07:09 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Kim Phillips,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:30:49 +0200
Detlev Zundel dzu@denx.de wrote:
as promised, here are my expanded notes from the BoF meeting at LSM2012 last week. It was a pleasure to get some core developers into one room
Any word on Kconfig support?
Kim
I was digging in it for a bit, but then Graeme took over.
I have started on it - I've ported over the Kbuild infrastructure into a dedicated 'kbuild' makefile which is called from the main makefile. This make modifications to the existing makefile very minimal
Now it's just a case of building all the Kconfig files which is, to say the least, a massive task. I have a lot of other things going on, so unfortunately progress is slow
How about a transitional phase, where a symbol can either be a kconfig symbol or handled the old way via the board config file? That way, custodians/maintainers could handle the conversion of their own symbols (with the expectation that this be done within a reasonable timeframe).
Well the plan in to have 'make xyz_config' produce the equivalent .config file (which it pretty much does anyway) - You can then use Kconfig to tweak the board config
Or use Kconfig to create a config from scratch
Regards,
Graeme