On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:31:46PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 12:29, Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:26 PM Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 11:28, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@intel.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:59:30PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
...
FWIW here is my tboot flash script for Edison:
This is rather unbriking script, DFU (luckily) works
Not if it is bricked: :-) I need something that always works.
def flash_edison(self, repo): vid = 0x8086 pid = 0xe005 expect = "%04x:%04x" % (vid, pid) self.wait_for_dfu(expect) u_boot = os.path.join(repo._local_str(), "u-boot-edison.img") bindir = self.usbboot_xfstk_dir self.host.exec0( "xfstk-dldr-solo", "--gpflags", "0x80000007", "--osimage", u_boot, "--fwdnx", os.path.join(bindir, "edison_dnx_fwr.bin"), "--fwimage", os.path.join(bindir, "edison_ifwi-dbg-00.bin"), "--osdnx", os.path.join(bindir, "edison_dnx_osr.bin"))To the topic, any suggestions on how to fix the current U-Boot regression?
The easiest thing is to use 'acpi list' and 'acpi dump facp' etc. to see what is different between the two commits. My testing was on coral and minnowmax and I must have missed it. We don't actually have any test coverage on the board-specific code.
=> acpi dump facp Table 'FACP' not found
This explains I believe everything.