
Hi Kever,
On 12 August 2016 at 03:57, Kever Yang kever.yang@rock-chips.com wrote:
This patch use clock API instead of hardcode for get pwm clock.
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang kever.yang@rock-chips.com
drivers/pwm/rk_pwm.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Simon Glass sjg@chromium.org
nit below
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/rk_pwm.c b/drivers/pwm/rk_pwm.c index 2d289a4..d69aab5 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/rk_pwm.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/rk_pwm.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ */
#include <common.h> +#include <clk.h> #include <div64.h> #include <dm.h> #include <pwm.h> @@ -13,9 +14,9 @@ #include <syscon.h> #include <asm/io.h> #include <asm/arch/clock.h> -#include <asm/arch/cru_rk3288.h> #include <asm/arch/grf_rk3288.h> #include <asm/arch/pwm.h> +#include <asm/arch/hardware.h> #include <power/regulator.h>
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; struct rk_pwm_priv { struct rk3288_pwm *regs; struct rk3288_grf *grf;
ulong freq;
};
static int rk_pwm_set_config(struct udevice *dev, uint channel, uint period_ns, @@ -38,8 +40,8 @@ static int rk_pwm_set_config(struct udevice *dev, uint channel, uint period_ns, RK_PWM_DISABLE, ®s->ctrl);
period = lldiv((uint64_t)(PD_BUS_PCLK_HZ / 1000) * period_ns, 1000000);
duty = lldiv((uint64_t)(PD_BUS_PCLK_HZ / 1000) * duty_ns, 1000000);
period = lldiv((uint64_t)(priv->freq / 1000) * period_ns, 1000000);
duty = lldiv((uint64_t)(priv->freq / 1000) * duty_ns, 1000000); writel(period, ®s->period_hpr); writel(duty, ®s->duty_lpr);
@@ -76,9 +78,18 @@ static int rk_pwm_ofdata_to_platdata(struct udevice *dev) static int rk_pwm_probe(struct udevice *dev) { struct rk_pwm_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
struct clk clk;
int ret = 0; rk_setreg(&priv->grf->soc_con2, 1 << 0);
ret = clk_get_by_index(dev, 0, &clk);
if (ret < 0) {
printf("%s get clock fail!\n", __func__);
debug() please.
return -EINVAL;
}
priv->freq = clk_get_rate(&clk);
return 0;
}
-- 1.9.1
Regards, Simon