
9 Jun
2012
9 Jun
'12
1:43 a.m.
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 1339176514-13137-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de you wrote:
-#define kzalloc(size, flags) calloc(size, 1) +#define kzalloc(size, flags) calloc(1, size)
Does this make any practical difference?
I mean, are you aware of any problem that gets fixed by this patch, or even any kind of performance degradation?
"common/dlmalloc.src" says:
calloc(size_t unit, size_t quantity); Returns a pointer to quantity * unit bytes, with all locations set to zero.
Multiplication being commutative, I see zero effect in this patch?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Business is like a wheelbarrow. Nothing ever happens until you start
pushing.