17 Feb
2009
17 Feb
'09
1:37 a.m.
On Monday 16 February 2009 19:29:22 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message Mike Frysinger you wrote:
apparently it's new to 2.6.29 ... i'm actively working/looking at 2.6.28.x which doesnt have 'M'.
Eventually that was triggered from our discussion here :-)
So it's actually printk("%pM", ...);
so do you want to go the %pM route (to make u-boot/linux code sharing easier) or move over only %M ?
I don't really care, but for the sake of code compatibility we probably should use Linux style.
ok ... it'll take me a bit to familiarize myself with the u-boot stdio code. then i'll send out the updated patch series (assuming all goes well). -mike