Hi Lukasz,
Le 18/10/2011 16:25, Lukasz Majewski a écrit :
Volatile keyword removal from ./arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewskil.majewski@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Parkkyungmin.park@samsung.com
arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h index 879e20e..b00ae30 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h @@ -25,11 +25,11 @@ /*
- Function prototypes to keep gcc -Wall happy.
*/ -extern void set_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr); +extern void set_bit(int nr, void *addr);
-extern void clear_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr); +extern void clear_bit(int nr, void *addr);
-extern void change_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr); +extern void change_bit(int nr, void *addr);
static inline void __change_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr) {
Going through backlogged patches adelegated to me, I found this one. I'm fine with it, however I notice there is absolutely no call to set_bit, change_bit or clear_bit in the whole ARM subtree... What is the point of removing only the volatile qualifier vs removing the function definitions?
Amicalement,