On 6/26/23 11:52, Marek Vasut wrote:
To avoid SRAM overflow in the SPL build, use simple malloc implementation.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marex@denx.de
Cc: Eugen Hristev eugen.hristev@collabora.com
configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig b/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig index 6b7e308680e..185694d4319 100644 --- a/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig +++ b/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE=0x10000 CONFIG_SPL_HAS_BSS_LINKER_SECTION=y CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR=0x20000000 CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE=0x80000 +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y # CONFIG_SPL_SHARES_INIT_SP_ADDR is not set CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC=y CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE=0x80000
why is the email patch arriving after patch was already applied? not to say that it was applied so fast and without going through at91 tree.