17 Jun
2012
17 Jun
'12
3:30 p.m.
Dear Fabio Estevam,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Otavio Salvador
otavio@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Fabio Estevam festevam@gmail.com wrote:
default:
return "unknown";
return "<unidentified>";I really don't see any improvement here.
It is just to avoid a i.MXunkown return; besides this is how I am doing in the mx23 code too.
This is OK. If you read "i.MXunkown" things are too broken already because the chip version could not be read.
Reading "i.MX<unidentified>" will make things no better.
This was from my head actually ... and I think this is better. The text is at least not mangled so badly. So let's keep it.
Best regards, Marek Vasut