On 09/06/2012 12:59 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 06/09/2012 19:49, Tom Rini wrote:
On 09/06/2012 01:04 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sbabic@denx.de
spl/Makefile | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile index f96c08e..77fc405 100644 --- a/spl/Makefile +++ b/spl/Makefile @@ -109,6 +109,12 @@ $(OBJTREE)/MLO: $(obj)u-boot-spl.bin -a $(CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE) -d $< $@ endif
+ifneq ($(CONFIG_IMX_CONFIG),) +$(OBJTREE)/MLO: $(obj)u-boot-spl.bin
- $(OBJTREE)/tools/mkimage -n $(SRCTREE)/$(CONFIG_IMX_CONFIG) -T imximage \
-e $(CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE) -d $< $@+endif
ALL-y += $(obj)u-boot-spl.bin
ifdef CONFIG_SAMSUNG
Is that really the name you want? MLO comes from some part or another (I've read it, just can't recall off-hand) of the IT ROM docs saying it will read a file named MLO.
I know...
Is mx35 in the same boat? Or just looking for a common name?
Right. It makes no sense that the binary for Freescale's SOCs has a name, for TI another one, for...we can generates less confusion if we uses the same name.
Agreed. I guess what I'm asking is, in the TI case the ROM reads FAT and must find 'MLO'. Does mx35 do the same or is the post-build step "dd if=MLO of=/dev/... ..." and the filename doesn't matter? I'm fine with the change now, just looking for the full details. Thanks!