Most of the platforms uses the platform type and particular boot stage on their image naming conventions in makefile like,
u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin - Allwinner U-Boot with SPL u-boot-spl-mtk.bin - Mediatek SPL bin
This would help to understand the users to what that particular image belongs to? and less confused.
On that note, use u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin instead of idbloader.img. idbloader.img is still a proper naming for rockchip external documentation but u-boot preferred spl name would always good choice in upstream tree.
Also, bin is more conventional way to include it on tools like binman, pad_cat etc in future patches.
Note: usage of platform type, boot stage doesn't follow consistent oder as of now.
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki jagan@amarulasolutions.com --- Makefile | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index b58107d6ef..a4278170d4 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ ALL-y += u-boot-with-dtb.bin endif
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP)$(CONFIG_SPL),yy) -ALL-y += idbloader.img +ALL-y += u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin endif
LDFLAGS_u-boot += $(LDFLAGS_FINAL) @@ -1347,11 +1347,11 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_SPL)$(CONFIG_TPL),yy) MKIMAGEFLAGS_u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin = -n $(CONFIG_SYS_SOC) -T $(ROCKCHIP_IMG_TYPE) tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin: tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin FORCE $(call if_changed,mkimage) -idbloader.img: tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE +u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin: tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE $(call if_changed,cat) else -MKIMAGEFLAGS_idbloader.img = -n $(CONFIG_SYS_SOC) -T $(ROCKCHIP_IMG_TYPE) -idbloader.img: spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE +MKIMAGEFLAGS_u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin = -n $(CONFIG_SYS_SOC) -T $(ROCKCHIP_IMG_TYPE) +u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin: spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE $(call if_changed,mkimage) endif