On 10/1/2024 2:15 PM, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
Hi Udit,
On 08:32-20240815, Kumar, Udit wrote:
On 8/13/2024 11:40 AM, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
MPU clock had been missing. Distinguish multiple clocks with clock-names and add MPU clock as well.
Signed-off-by: Manorit Chawdhry m-chawdhry@ti.com
arch/arm/dts/k3-am69-r5-sk.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/dts/k3-j7200-r5-common-proc-board.dts | 3 ++- arch/arm/dts/k3-j721e-r5.dtsi | 3 ++- arch/arm/dts/k3-j721s2-r5.dtsi | 3 ++- arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-r5-evm.dts | 3 ++- 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/k3-am69-r5-sk.dts b/arch/arm/dts/k3-am69-r5-sk.dts index f177f563527f..9bbf76d8bf35 100644 --- a/arch/arm/dts/k3-am69-r5-sk.dts +++ b/arch/arm/dts/k3-am69-r5-sk.dts @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ power-domains = <&k3_pds 61 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>, <&k3_pds 202 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>; resets = <&k3_reset 202 0>;
clocks = <&k3_clks 61 0>;
clocks = <&k3_clks 61 0>, <&k3_clks 202 0>;Thanks for catching this
Could we think of having SOC specific R5 dt , So that we don't need to update such SOC information at each board level
Similar to what is done (k3-j721e-r5.dtsi)
Seems like a good idea but I believe that it could be a separate activity regardless of this series, it can be taken up later. Current series is putting it in the respective files so should be a non blocker.
another series is ok for this change
Regards, Manorit